<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>The UnSponsored Link: Consumer Reports WebWatch&apos;s Weblog</title>
      <link>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 14:27:10 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=3.2</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <item>
         <title>Like Taking Candy from a Baby: Our Study on Kids&apos; Sites and Commercialization</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>WebWatch and the Mediatech Foundation released this report today (check out the video <a href="http://www.youtube.com/cwwkids">here</a> on YouTube):</p>

<p>Study Shows Children’s Web Sites May Be Entertaining, <br />
But May Also Make Kids Cry<br />
Most Popular Sites Commercialized; Some ‘Sell’ Kids’ Creations Back to Them</p>

<p>YONKERS, New York, Tuesday, May 6 – Publishers of many major children’s Web sites should do a better job disclosing sales and advertising information to parents, especially as more kids at younger ages go online to play and meet friends, says a study released today by Consumer Reports WebWatch and the Mediatech Foundation of Flemington, N.J.<br />
For the study, parents in 10 families used video cameras to keep journals, providing insights into the way children use sites such as Club Penguin, Webkinz, Nick Jr., Barbie.com and others. Footage from those journals, which can be viewed at <a href="http://www.youtube.com/cwwkids">http://www.youtube.com/cwwkids</a>, illustrates how young children respond to advertising and marketing tactics online. <br />
	</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2008/05/like_taking_candy_from_a_baby.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2008/05/like_taking_candy_from_a_baby.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 14:27:10 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Uncovered: A Phishing Scammer&apos;s Toolbox -- Check This Out!</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to Derek Smythe at <a href="http://www.aa419.org">Artists Against 419</a> for this item.<br />
The group dug up a <a href="http://www.zenithbankplcafrica.org/lagbaja234.php">PHP-based mass mailer </a>using a fake domain name that sounds like a real bank (and is quite close to the domain name of the real bank). The fake bank is www.zenithbankplafrica.org (yes, .org, which most people attribute to non-profit organizations and therefore, attach more credibility). The real bank is here: <a href="http://www.zenithbank.com">http://www.zenithbank.com</a><br />
aa419 cached a screenshot of this spam tool <a href="http://i297.photobucket.com/albums/mm221/Derek419_bucket/NaijaBoys.png">here</a> if the real one is taken down. Of course, the bogus bank domain is a private registration. Click the link below for Derek's comments. Note, by the way, that a huge number of fraudulent domains are hosted here in the United States by U.S. registrars. In trying to spread the word about aa419's work, Derek says, "I have found it amazing is that American registrars are extremely tolerant of fraudulent domains and most unhelpful, much more so than their counterparts in other countries. Despite reports of fraud and fake whois, most registrars do not even bother replying. Those that do<br />
state they can do nothing."<br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2008/04/uncovered_a_phishing_scammers_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2008/04/uncovered_a_phishing_scammers_1.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 10:33:29 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>&apos;lookstoogoodtobetrue.com&apos; Funny Fed Cops/Industry Fraud Ed Site</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Ran across <a href="http://www.lookstoogoodtobetrue.com/fraudtypes/escrowfraud.aspx">this site </a>while putting together our forthcoming press release on fraud in auctions. It's linked from the home page of <a href="http://Escrow.com">Escrow.com</a>, which has some fraud education content of its own worth reading. One of the funny things about LooksTooGoodToBeTrue.com is the slightly slick, slightly cheesy look reminiscent of so many fraud sites we see. And it's funny they would play on the most oft-repeated cliche of fraud education: If it looks/sounds too good to be true, it is. Take a look at this page on their site for a list of <a href="http://www.lookstoogoodtobetrue.com/alert.aspx">current phishing and other scams</a>.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2008/04/lookstoogoodtobetruecom_funny.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2008/04/lookstoogoodtobetruecom_funny.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 14:13:56 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Princeton Premier -- Not in Princeton, and How Premier?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Let's trace a spam e-mail making current rounds that plays on one of the seven deadly sins -- vanity, supposedly Uncle Scratch's favorite, if you believe the movie <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LpkTjtmuNA4&feature=related">The Devil's Advocate</a>. We tracked down apparent exclusive biography publisher Princeton Premier (though not by the phone number in its spam e-mail). Shockingly, it's not in Princeton, New Jersey, home to the prestigious alma mater of <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/2020/stossel">John Stossel</a>. In fact, it seems to be in bucolic but pleasant Astoria, N.Y., home to several excellent <a href="http://www.urbanspoon.com/ch/3/2498/New-York/Greek-Captain.html">Greek restaurants</a>. We're left wondering whether the company is legitimate or if someone's trying to hijack their mailing list -- we couldn't get Princeton Premier to return our calls to confirm. Click the link below and we'll start with the whole spam letter on the next page.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2008/03/princeton_premier_a_scam_at_be.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2008/03/princeton_premier_a_scam_at_be.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 10:42:20 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Getting the Most Out of an Online Auction: Help Us!</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Next week we'll be distributing our third consumer fact sheet in our "Look Before You Click" initiative that's supported by grants from the New York State Attorney General's office. It's about online auctions, though its purpose is actually auction-friendly, providing tips for consumers to get the most out of them. We'll be following it up with two more fact sheets on auction fraud. Click below to read our tips and offer your comments.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2008/03/getting_the_most_out_of_an_onl.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2008/03/getting_the_most_out_of_an_onl.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:30:42 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Beware IRS Phishing Scam: It Ain&apos;t the Taxman</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Online scam artists can certainly be creative and opportunistic. This year we've got scammers <a href="http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=180075,00.html">claiming to be from the IRS</a> and playing on two of the most powerful of human emotions, fear and greed. The first is a phishing scheme in which the scammers try to steal key personal information on the pretense of resolving some sort of problem with your taxes. That one's actually been around a while. The second is a phone or e-mail scam taking advantage of the "economic stimulus" checks to be sent out to many of us in early May. You guessed it, the scammers are using the pretense of the payout to wheedle bank account numbers from victims -- "give us your bank account number so we can process your payment," or something similar. Don't buy it.<br />
As with many phishing scams, foreknowledge is forearmament: The IRS doesn't use e-mail to contact people about tax problems. Nor, <a href="http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=180075,00.html">it says</a>, will it be contacting people by e-mail about the rebate checks. There's more info about the checks, who's going to get them and how much, by the way, at the IRS' <a href="http://www.irs.gov/">Web site</a>.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2008/03/beware_irs_phishing_scam_it_ai.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2008/03/beware_irs_phishing_scam_it_ai.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 10:14:02 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Online Auction Fraud Tips -- Help Us Out!</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>In our continued crowdsourcing efforts to improve our New York state education campaign, please click the link below to read our consumer tips on online auctions -- this is the first in a series of three, so it's not comprehensive about all types of auction rip-offs. Please give us any feedback you have -- it will help us refine and improve these fact sheets prior to our statewide distribution plan shortly.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2008/03/online_auction_fraud_tips_help.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2008/03/online_auction_fraud_tips_help.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:51:53 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Staying Safe Online: General Tips -- You Can Help</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Here's the first information sheet in our forthcoming New York state campaign, supported by a grant from the New York State Attorney General's office, to educate consumers about steps to take to avoid online crime. Please let us know if you have any comments or anything you think we should add to this tip sheet. Click below to see the whole page. And thanks to those who helped us improve our page on phishing we posted earlier this week.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2008/03/staying_safe_online_general_ti.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2008/03/staying_safe_online_general_ti.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:44:14 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>It&apos;s Kieren, not Kieran</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Note correction of the spelling of Kieren McCarthy's name in our post below on the Commerce Department's Joint Project Agreement with ICANN -- sorry we can't correct it in the document now in DOC's possession. And take a read of <a href="http://blog.icann.org/"> ICANN's blog </a>.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2008/03/its_kieren_not_kieran.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2008/03/its_kieren_not_kieran.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 15:22:11 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Tips to Prevent Phishing</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>As part of a grant from the New York State Attorney General's office, we want to make consumers more aware of cybercrime. We've created some tips to prevent phishing and would like to get your comments on them. Click the link below and feel free to copy it and send it to a friend. We'll be posting it in Spanish shortly as well.<br />
Thanks to Max Weinstein of Harvard's Berkman Center (and <a href="http://www.stopbadware.org">StopBadware.org's </a>chief) for feedback.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2008/03/tips_to_prevent_phishing.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2008/03/tips_to_prevent_phishing.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:22:33 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Farewell, Netscape Navigator</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>If you've been online since the mid-90s, chances are your first glimpse of a Web page was via the Netscape Navigator.</p>

<p>In its heyday, the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netscape_%28web_browser%29 ">Navigator</a> enjoyed a commanding 90% share of the browser market, which helped turn <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netscape">Netscape</a> into the Google with of its day, an Internet 1.0 darling whose astronomical 1995 IPO helped launch the (first) Internet bubble.</p>

<p>Netscape’s success didn’t go unnoticed by Microsoft, which had been slow to realize the potential of the Internet—not to mention the threat to its bottom line. The software giant waged a brutal and successful campaign to supplant the Navigator with its Internet Explorer by bundling it as part of its ubiquitous Windows operating system. Netscape's Navigator simply couldn’t compete with a free browser installed on 90% of all PCs, and by 1998, lost the so-called <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Browser_wars">browser war</a> and surrendered the top spot to the Internet Explorer.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2008/03/farewell_netscape_navigator_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2008/03/farewell_netscape_navigator_1.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 15:23:17 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>In Praise of My M&amp;Ms.com&apos;s Transparency</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>As the in-house Internet integrity division of Consumers Union, we here at WebWatch spend a good deal of time reviewing sites for other CU publications. Although the majority of the sites we review satisfy WebWatch’s <a href="http://www.consumerwebwatch.org/consumer-reports-webwatch-guidelines.cfm">credibility guidelines</a>, some do so better than others. </p>

<p>Recently, we came across a case in point while reviewing a site for <a href="http://www.shopsmartmag.org">ShopSmart</a> magazine, namely, <a href="http://www.mymms.com">My M&M’s</a>.</p>

<p>One of the first things we look for when asked to review a site is an indication of ownership, and you’d be surprised how many sites simply don’t disclose this simple—but crucial—bit of information. If you're ever wondering if a site is credible and you can't figure out who owns it, stop wondering and click away.</p>

<p>Most sites (like WebWatch), tend to disclose their ownership in an “About Us” section. And while My M&M’s lists its parent company, Mars, Inc. at the bottom of the site, it goes one step further with a <a href="http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/site_owner.html" onclick="window.open('http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/site_owner.html','popup','width=516,height=380,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false">site owner</a> link at the bottom of every page. </p>

<p>We wish more sites made it this easy to determine who the owner is and how to contact them, without forcing users to click around the site or scroll to the bottom of the privacy policy, where far too many sites tend to bury this information.<br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2008/02/in_praise_of_my_mmscom_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2008/02/in_praise_of_my_mmscom_1.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 09:38:04 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>WebWatch Statement on ICANN Joint Project Agreement with U.S. Commerce Department</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.icann.org">ICANN</a> is holding its 31st International Public Meeting in New Delhi this week, discussing topics such as Internet internationalization and increasing domain names choices. WebWatch Director Beau Brendler, a member of ICANN's At-Large Advisory Committee, is attending, and will present WebWatch's comments on ICANN Joint Project Agreement with U.S. Commerce Department:</p>

<p>                                             COMMENTS OF CONSUMER REPORTS WEBWATCH,</p>

<p>                  Consumers Union of the U.S., On ICANN Joint Project Agreement with U.S. Commerce Department</p>

<p>February 14, 2008</p>

<p>Consumer Reports WebWatch of the Consumers Union, representing 9 million consumers in the United States and Canada, supports ICANN’s efforts to evolve and move forward toward an existence apart from the JPA agreement with the U.S. Department of Commerce. However, at this mid-term review phase, we do not believe the organization is ready to function without a similar accountability mechanism to the JPA in place. Major changes need to occur within the organization to assure more efficient and meaningful user community representation, with long-term guarantees that such representation would endure unforeseen scenarios in the future.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2008/02/webwatchs_comments_on_icann_jo.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2008/02/webwatchs_comments_on_icann_jo.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 10:21:50 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Obama.com  vs. Clinton.com - Mac vs. PC?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>If you haven't already read it, check out this entertaining <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/04/technology/04link.html?_r=3&oref=slogin&oref=slogin">article</a> in the <em>New York Times</em> comparing and contrasting the Web sites of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. According to the story, experts believe Obama is a Mac and Clinton is a PC, à la Apple's ubiquitous ad campaign. Visit <a href="http://www.barackobama.com">BarackObama.com</a> and <a href="http://hillaryclinton.com/">HillaryClinton.com</a> and judge for yourself.<br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2008/02/obamacom_vs_clintoncom_mac_vs.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2008/02/obamacom_vs_clintoncom_mac_vs.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 13:10:50 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>eBay To Ban Negative Seller Feedback: See Yesmovies</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Sellers aren't too happy about eBay's <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7228460.stm">plans to ban sellers </a>from giving bad feedback to buyers, but consumers should be excited. It certainly would have helped <a href="http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2007/11/avoiding_ebay_purveyors_of_boo.html">my situation </a>with Yesmovies. It would be interesting to know whose transactions go south more often, from which direction. All I know is that when Yesmovies left me negative feedback as a retaliation, it really made a dent in my percentage of positive reviews (one negative out of 106) than my feedback made in hers (one negative in more than 3,200).</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2008/02/ebay_to_ban_negative_seller_fe.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2008/02/ebay_to_ban_negative_seller_fe.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 11:13:22 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
