<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>The UnSponsored Link: Consumer Reports WebWatch&apos;s Weblog</title>
      <link>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2010</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 15:45:37 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=3.2</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <item>
         <title>Farewell from The UnSponsored Link</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Dear Readers, </p>

<p>Due to economic considerations, Consumers Union has decided to <a href="http://www.walletpop.com/blog/2009/06/09/web-watchdog-site-shut-down-by-consumers-union">shut down</a> Consumer Reports WebWatch as of July 31, 2009. </p>

<p>Along with our parent site, <a href="http://www.consumerwebwatch.org/">Consumer Reports WebWatch</a>, the UnSponsored Link will remain online as a consumer resource, but we'll no longer be able to follow-up on your comments or investigation requests. As such, for our last post, we’d like to highlight some of the techniques we’ve used to uncover the dozens of online scams we’ve exposed in this blog. We hope you’ll be able to use these methods to spot an online scam before you find yourself scammed.</p>

<center><img alt="emailheader2.jpg" src="http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/emailheader2.jpg" width="424" height="224" /></center><center>The Look of a Classic Online Scam</center>

<p><strong>1. Does the site provide full contact information?</strong><br />
Credible Web sites should clearly disclose the physical location where they are produced, including an address, a telephone number or e-mail address. Although this information is typically found on a “contact us” or “about us” page, some sites stick it in the privacy policy (usually at the very bottom) or terms of use, so you may have to do some clicking and scrolling. If all else fails, check the return policy for an address. If you’ve exhausted all these options and still can’t find an address, find another site.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2009/07/farewell_from_the_unsponsored.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2009/07/farewell_from_the_unsponsored.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 15:45:37 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Pirate Party Seizes a Euro Parliament Seat </title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Sweden's Pirate Party <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10259048-38.html?tag=newsEditorsPicksArea.0">secured a seat in the European Parliament</a> after winning 7.1% of the Swedish vote, a major victory for a party dedicated to reforming copyright law, dismantling the patent system and preserving online privacy.</p>

<center><img alt="155px-Piratpartiet.svg.png" src="http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/155px-Piratpartiet.svg.png" width="155" height="155" /></center><center>The Pirate Party's Jolly Roger</center>

<p>Despite its name, the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pirate_Party">Pirate Party</a> is no joke. Founded in 2006 with the launch of its website, the <em>Piratpartiet</em> is now Sweden's third-largest in terms of membership (it's especially popular among the young and Web-savvy), and came in fifth place in the European Parliament elections behind the Social Democrats, Greens, Liberals and the Moderate Party. </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2009/06/pirate_party_seizes_a_euro_par.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2009/06/pirate_party_seizes_a_euro_par.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 11:09:52 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Webloyalty.com Faces Senate Scrutiny</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>As if a class-action lawsuit wasn't bad enough, it turns out the antics of our <a href="http://www.consumerwebwatch.org/dynamic/ecommerce-investigation-webloyalty.cfm">old friends</a> at Webloyalty.com have aroused the attentions of the Senate Commerce Committee, according to the <em>Washington Post</em> blog <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/small-change/ylan-q-mui/check-your-credit-card-stateme.html">Small Change</a>. Last week, writes Post reporter Ylan Mui, the Commerce Committee sent a letter to Webloyalty seeking more information about its billing practices. </p>

<center><img alt="top_logo_rr.gif" src="http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/top_logo_rr.gif" width="342" height="85" /></center>

<p>As we <a href="http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2009/03/webloyalty_members_due_for_com_1.html">wrote earlier this year</a>, Webloyalty made money from customers who (often unwittingly) paid monthly fees to the consumer discount clubs it operated, including Reservation Rewards, Shoppers Discounts & Rewards, Members Specials, Buyer Assurance, Distinctive Privileges, PC Protection Plus, Travel Values, Travel Values Plus, Classmates Rewards and Wallet Shield. <br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2009/06/webloyaltycom_faces_senate_scr_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2009/06/webloyaltycom_faces_senate_scr_1.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 13:30:33 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Real Benefits Association Gets a Failing Grade from the BBB</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>A reader sent us the following e-mail last week:</p>

<p><em>Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 8:46 PM<br />
Subject: Help - Please<br />
http://www.rbausa.com<br />
Is the above company a legit health care provider?<br />
Mike</em><br />
<center><img alt="logo_2level.gif" src="http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/logo_2level.gif" width="144" height="35" /></center></p>

<p>While we can't say for sure if <a href="http://www.rbausa.com" rel="nofollow">Real Benefits Association</a> actually is a legitimate health care provider, we can say that we suggest looking elsewhere for health insurance. </p>

<p>Why? First off, the RBA's site fails the WebWatch <a href="http://www.consumerwebwatch.org/consumer-reports-webwatch-guidelines.cfm">smell test</a>, due to the lack of a privacy policy. The site contained a number of other read flags as well, including a "Disclaimer" link takes you to a <a href="http://www.rbausa.com/new/disclaimer.php">page with temporary text</a>, an "In the News Link that leads to <a href="http://www.rbausa.com/new/in_the_news.php">a blank 'coming soon' page</a> and a "More About Company" link on the homepage that steers you to a <a href="http://www.rbausa.com/index_orig.html">dead page</a>.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2009/06/real_benefits_association_gets.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2009/06/real_benefits_association_gets.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 11:17:05 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Earth4Energy.com Keeps Generating Feedback</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>We love to hear from readers commenting on our blog, but none of our posts (with the possible exception of post  we did on <a href="http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2008/03/princeton_premier_a_scam_at_be.html">Princeton Premier</a>), have generated such a steady stream of comments as the one we did on <a href="http://www.earth4energy.com/" rel="nofollow">Earth4Energy.com</a>. Although we blogged about Earth4Energy.com back in September, not a month has gone by without readers adding their two cents. </p>

<center><img alt="bigbox2.jpg" src="http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/bigbox2.jpg" width="197" height="243" /></center><center>A Source of Free Electricity or a Waste of $49.97?</center>

<p>While we faulted the site for a lack of contact information, hyperlinks that don't link to anything and the fact it appears to be just another Web-based affiliate marketing program, readers took the conversation to a whole new level. </p>

<p>Comments range from scathing (Absolute scam!!!!!!), regretful (I bought it like a fool and it is junk..pure rubbish), defensive (Earth4energy is not a scam product. It's a great product created by Michael Harvey which can help us save our electricity usage to great extent. For more details about this product, visit Earth 4 Energy website), and technical (At $200.00 per panel that is about $67.00 dollars per amp. Most houses today require a 200 amp electrical service. That would require sixty seven panels at a cost of $13,400 plus the $49.95 for the manual.)</p>

<p>Is Earth4Energy.com just another of the thousands of scam sites out there, or a viable, do-it-yourself alternative to affordable energy? <a href="http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2008/09/earth4energycom_is_not_a_credi.html">Decide for yourself</a>. </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2009/05/earth4energycom_keeps_generati.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2009/05/earth4energycom_keeps_generati.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 15:49:26 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Don&apos;t Download from Defenza.com</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>A read sent us the following question: <em>Is Defenza.com's anti-spyware tool rogue?</em> </p>

<center><img alt="1boxw.jpg" src="http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/1boxw.jpg" width="92" height="110" /></center>

<p>The short answer is yes. </p>

<p>First off, Googling "defenza.com" with McAfee Site Adviser yielded results flagged with a red X and a warning to "use with caution."  According to the <a href="http://www.siteadvisor.com/sites/defenza.com">Site Adviser report</a>,   "When we visited this site, we found that it may be affiliated with other ''red' sites."  The other red site in question is cashengines.com, of <a href="http://www.siteadvisor.com/sites/cashengines.com/summary/">which McAfee said</a>: "When we visited this site, we found that it funds and facilitates the creation of numerous identical web sites, which charge fees for products available elsewhere for free."</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2009/05/dont_download_from_defenzacom.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2009/05/dont_download_from_defenzacom.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 09:49:31 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>WolframAlpha — A Computational Knowledge Engine</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Despite a lot of <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8052798.stm">media coverage</a> about a potential new competitor to Google, the <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-11386_3-10242353-76.html?tag=mncol;txt">newly launched</a> WolframAlpha isn't really a search engine. According to its creator, it's a <a href="http://www.wolframalpha.com/faqs.html">computational knowledge engine</a>. </p>

<center><img alt="Wolfram_Alpha.png" src="http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/Wolfram_Alpha.png" width="355" height="48" /></center>

<p>Unlike Google and other search engines, WolframAlpha doesn't indiscriminately trawl the Web for information whose sources can range from scholarly journals to the rantings of lunatic bloggers.  According it’s FAQ page: "It can only know things that are known, and are somehow public. It only deals with facts, not opinions."</p>

<p>Rather, WolframAlpha performs computations from its own internal knowledge base, more than <a href="http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/article6294437.ece">10 trillion pieces of information</a> sourced from thousands of official websites, libraries and academic journals, and checked by experts. </p>

<p>Jonathan Zittrain, a law professor at Harvard and the co-founder of the Berkman Center for Internet and Society, describes it as a “<a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/04/28/wolfram-alpha-veil-lifted/?em">computable almanac</a>.”</p>

<p>Don't take our word for it. Experience <a href="http://www.wolframalpha.com/">WolframAlpha</a> for yourself. If you have trouble wrapping your Googled mind around this non-search engine, visit the <a href="http://www.wolframalpha.com/examples/">examples page</a> for suggestions on how to take advantage of this new information resource.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2009/05/wolframalpha_a_computational_k.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2009/05/wolframalpha_a_computational_k.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 15:00:59 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>&apos;Apple Users at Risk as Mac Malware Mushrooms&apos;</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>The days of Apple owners chuckling smugly as they read the about latest virus infecting Windows-based PCS are drawing to a close, according to a recent article in <em>SC Magazine</em>.</p>

<p>"The past few months has seen a dramatic rise in the number and complexity of malware programs being used to target Apple users and the situation is only going to get worse, according to security vendors, and part of the problem may be down to Apple users themselves."</p>

<p><a href="http://www.securecomputing.net.au/News/143087,apple-users-at-risk-as-mac-malware-mushrooms.aspx">Mac users, take note</a>.<br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2009/05/apple_users_at_risk_as_mac_mal.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2009/05/apple_users_at_risk_as_mac_mal.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 14:56:18 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>FreeScroll.com/Historical Research Center Response</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Here's a response from Mike Dell, general manager of The Historical Research Center, to our <a href="http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2009/05/myfreescrollcom_multipitch_web.html">blog post</a> about MyFreeScroll.com, selling genealogical for $7.</p>

<p>"Concerns: Your article on Myfreescroll has some inconsistencies. I am the General Manager of The Historical Research Center. We are not a franchise business. We are a business opportunity business. Not sure where you got the 5,000 pounds as a start up figure.  We have a start up package for $995.00.  Unlike a franchise, all of this money is for inventory. There are no franchise fees.  If you want to evaluate whether or not we are at Ellis Island, try giving the gift shop a call.  They will tell you if we are there or not.  By the way we have been there for about 10 years.  When we filmed our ad there we obtained permission from the National Park Service.  By the way, the free search on the Ellis Island web site is terrific.  We use some of that information ourselves, however we also go way beyond just the immigration records at Ellis Island. Our researchers look for the meaning, origin and historical references from as far back as 1,000 years ago.  Give me a call at (xxx) xxx-xxxx or send me an email if you have any questions."</p>

<p>Click on the link below for our response.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2009/05/freescrollcomhistorical_resear.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2009/05/freescrollcomhistorical_resear.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 15:40:22 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>&apos;Security Firms Warn of Malware Avalanche&apos;</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>If you've been following this blog for the past few days, you'll know we've had our hands full with some particularly <a href="http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2009/05/nasty_packet_of_malware_and_ba.html">virulent malware</a>, thanks to a site called <a href="http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2009/05/do_not_visit_scamsearchcom_1.html">ScamSearch.com</a>.  We posted an <a href="http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2009/05/its_a_jungle_out_there.html">update</a> yesterday, pasting a mind-blowing and PC-frying assortment of malware that infected one of our machines. </p>

<p>So we weren't surprised at all to come across an article in <em>SC Magazine</em> warning of a "malware avalanche."</p>

<p>According to the article, "Security firm Fortinet's April 2009 Threatscape Report identified more incidents of new and known malware infections than ever before. Fortinet said that certain countries and areas are being specifically targeted, and that China had seen the worst attacks. The report also identified online gaming sites as the most common vehicles for infection."</p>

<p><a href="http://www.securecomputing.net.au/News/144428,security-firms-warn-of-malware-avalanche.aspx">Read the article</a> and make sure all your security software is activated and up-to-date.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2009/05/security_firms_warn_of_malware_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2009/05/security_firms_warn_of_malware_1.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 14:57:07 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>It&apos;s a Jungle Out There</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>After recent escapades with ScamSearch.com and other likely suspects, here's what I've just cleaned off my home machine -- pasted on the next page. More than 213 infected files and still counting. This is with Avast! enabled, firewall enabled. How's this stuff getting through? Is my machine compromised? We're supposed to be <a href="http://www.badwarebusters.org">experts in this stuff</a>, and we don't have answers. I turned off Avast! to download the <a href="http://devbuilds.kaspersky-labs.com/devbuilds/AVPTool/">Kaspersky virus removal tool</a>, which has been running now for a couple of hours. I hope this will be able to clean this garbage out of my machine so I don't have to do a reinstall.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2009/05/its_a_jungle_out_there.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2009/05/its_a_jungle_out_there.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 17:07:11 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Beware of Malicious &apos;U.S. Government&apos; Sites </title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>While searching for the domain behind <a href="http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2009/05/do_not_visit_scamsearchcom_1.html">ScamSearch.com</a>, we happened upon an extremely useful site, <a href="http://www.malwaredomainlist.com/mdl.php">Malware Domain List</a>, which, as its name implies, is a list of malware-laden domain names. </p>

<p>When we located the domain responsible for all the <a href="http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2009/05/nasty_packet_of_malware_and_ba.html">malware to hit our machines</a>, we couldn't help noticing a slew of malicious sites masquerading as official U.S. government domain names, such as "ustreasury.federalbanksystem.net," "ustreasury.federalbanks.us," "usbanks.esecure-federal.us," and so on.</p>

<center><img alt="beatles_1379342c.jpg" src="http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/beatles_1379342c.jpg" width="307" height="192" /></center><center>To Sir, with Malware</center>

<p>All of them have one thing in common: they contain an especially difficult-to-detect piece of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crimeware">crimeware</a> called <a href="http://novirusthanks.org/blog/2009/03/luckysploit-new-exploit-kit/">LuckySploit</a>, an exploit toolkit that infects unsuspecting visitors to a site via <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drive-by_download">drive-by-download</a>, installing malware that allows cybercriminals to access personal information by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keystroke_logging">keystroke logging</a>.</p>

<p>Sir Paul McCartney's <a href="http://paulmccartney.com/">site</a> was recently hacked to <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/scienceandtechnology/technology/technologynews/5131987/Paul-McCartney-website-hacked-by-cybercriminals.html">infect visitors with LuckySploit</a>. ScanSafe, the security firm that <a href="http://www.scansafe.com/threat_center/threat_alerts/mccartney_needs_a_little_help_from_his_friends_after_his_website_was_hacked">detected and neutralized</a> the program, described LuckySploit as "the most advanced and sophisticated version of crimeware toolkits."<br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2009/05/beware_of_malicious_us_governm_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2009/05/beware_of_malicious_us_governm_1.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 16:24:46 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Posting ScamSearch Warning to Avast! Forums</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>At the suggestion of a <a href="http://www.badwarebusters.org">BadwareBusters</a> community member, we posted a new topic on the Avast! board on ScamSearch.com <a href="http://forum.avast.com/index.php?topic=45268.0">here</a>. WebWatch has been suggesting Avast!'s free AV program for home use, and the Avast! forum says it's got more than 60,000 members, so let's see if we can find out how ScamSearch's badware missile got through its defenses.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2009/05/posting_scamsearch_warning_to.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2009/05/posting_scamsearch_warning_to.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 13:26:32 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Hackers Steal Medical Records, Demand $10M Ransom</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>A group of hackers stole millions of medical records from <a href="http://itacidentityblog.com/hackers-holding-va-health-data-for-10-million-ransom">Virginia's prescription drug database</a>, then asked for $10 million in ransom. It's the crime of the future! Or maybe the present. Thanks, ITAC Blog.<br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2009/05/hackers_steal_medical_records.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2009/05/hackers_steal_medical_records.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 13:09:33 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Reporting ScamSearch.com to Google</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>After some interesting exchanges on<a href="http://www.badwarebusters.org"> BadwareBusters.org, </a>we posted a malware report to Google <a href="http://www.google.com/safebrowsing/report_badware/">here</a>, using the form. We encourage you to do the same when similar things happen to you. We'll also post to the Avast! forums later today and talk about the results. Also posted a tweet on Twitter. I just loaded the site again by accident and the drive-by downloads seem to be gone, but I still would not remotely trust this site. Too bad because it's a good idea in theory.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2009/05/reporting_scamsearchcom_to_goo.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.consumerwebwatch.org/2009/05/reporting_scamsearchcom_to_goo.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 10:16:20 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>

